Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.sys.sun.misc:8716 comp.sys.sun.admin:15508 comp.unix.solaris:4527 comp.unix.bsd:12270 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!news.dfn.de!scsing.switch.ch!epflnews!siisun!brossard From: brossard@siisun.epfl.ch (Alain Brossard EPFL-SIC/SII) Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.misc,comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 (SunOS 4.1.3) on Classic/LX Followup-To: comp.unix.solaris Date: 15 Jul 1993 09:54:30 GMT Organization: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne Lines: 17 Sender: brossard@siisun (Alain Brossard EPFL-SIC/SII) Distribution: world Message-ID: <2239gm$eqq@info.epfl.ch> References: <20uej3$26t@tadpole.tadpole.com> <1993Jul2.064435.6281@Cigna.COM> <STEINAR.HAUG.93Jul14121847@runit.sintef.no> <221ev6$4q9@k2.sj.ate.slb.COM> Reply-To: brossard@sic.epfl.ch NNTP-Posting-Host: siisun.epfl.ch [[ followup limited to comp.unix.solaris ]] In article <221ev6$4q9@k2.sj.ate.slb.COM>, poffen@San-Jose.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger) writes: |> |> I hope it is faster. My manager volunteered to be the Guinea pig for Solaris |> 2.2, and he claims it is far slower running OpenWindows on a Classic than |> running OpenWindows on a SS-1 running 4.1.1. My impression is rather the reverse, my feelings are that Open Windows 3.2 (Solaris 2.2) runs faster than Open Windows 3.0 (4.1.3) on my SS10-41. Of course I have sufficient memory (64MB) so that may make a difference. -- Alain Brossard, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, SIC/SII, EL-Ecublens, CH-1015 Lausanne, Suisse, +41 21 693-2211 brossard@sic.epfl.ch