Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.sys.sun.misc:8733 comp.sys.sun.admin:15567 comp.unix.solaris:4569 comp.unix.bsd:12279 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!gatech!indigo!willard!dawson Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.misc,comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 (SunOS 4.1.3) on Classic/LX Message-ID: <2F9q7B1w165w@willard.atl.ga.us> From: dawson@willard.atl.ga.us (Willard Dawson) Date: Thu, 15 Jul 93 20:27:12 EDT References: <1993Jul15.174424.21837@schbbs.mot.com> Organization: Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814 Lines: 22 vosburg@mli.mot.com (Jeff Vosburg) writes: > In article <221ev6$4q9@k2.sj.ate.slb.COM>, poffen@San-Jose.ate.slb.com (Russ > |> > |> I hope it is faster. My manager volunteered to be the Guinea pig for Solar > |> 2.2, and he claims it is far slower running OpenWindows on a Classic than > |> running OpenWindows on a SS-1 running 4.1.1. > |> > > Be careful what you're comparing, Russ. SunOS 4.1.1 used OpenWin > Version 2, while Solaris 2.x (and even 4.1.3) use Openwin Version 3. > Version 3 definitely is more memory intensive that 2, so this is > probably where you are seeing the slow down. I am curious how much > RAM is in the SS1 vs the Classic? Assuming that you've not installed OW3, of course. I did, on SunOS 4.1.1... -- dawson@willard.atl.ga.us (Willard Dawson) gatech!kd4nc!vdbsan!willard!dawson emory!uumind!willard!dawson Willard's House BBS, Atlanta, GA -- +1 (404) 664 8814