*BSD News Article 18587


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:48566 comp.os.386bsd.questions:3906 comp.windows.x.i386unix:2577
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.windows.x.i386unix
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!gatech!usenet.ufl.edu!usenet.cis.ufl.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!livia.acs.Virginia.EDU!jeg7e
From: jeg7e@livia.acs.Virginia.EDU (Jon Gefaell)
Subject: Re: SUMMARY: 486DX2/66 for Unix conclusions (fairly long)
Message-ID: <CADHLA.9Fz@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: Security and Technology Planning, ITC/UVA
References: <21k903$3q4@GRAPEVINE.LCS.MIT.EDU> <JOHNSONM.93Jul12091953@calypso.oit.unc.edu> <1993Jul12.182304@informatik.uni-kl.de> <ig25.742571041@fg70>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1993 18:19:58 GMT
Lines: 15

In article <ig25.742571041@fg70> ig25@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (Thomas Koenig) writes:
>
>Of course, swapped - out processes better had not be interactive, or
>users will complain very loudly about response time.  An operating
>system which does stuff like that had better distinguish between
>interactive and batch jobs; I'm not aware of any UNIX variant which
>actually does so.  I know MVS does, and I'm pretty sure VMS does, too.

SVR4 knows of three classes of processes, batch, interactive and real time.
-- 
 ______ 
 \ \  / Jon Gefaell, Computer Systems Engineer      | Amateur Radio - KD4CQY
  \/\/  Information Technology and Communications   | -Will chmod for food-
   \/   The University of Virginia, Charlottesville |  Hacker@Virginia.EDU
Any opinions expressed herein are not intended to be construed as those of UVA