*BSD News Article 19645


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:241 comp.os.386bsd.misc:698
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc,alt.os.bsdi
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!nmt.edu!mimbres.cs.unm.edu!ncar!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!decwrl!pa.dec.com!jac.nuo.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!ryn.mro4.dec.com!janix.pcs.dec.com!decum!uli
From: uw@decum.enet.dec.com (Ul[r]i[ch] Wendl)
Subject: Re: Why would I want LINUX?
Message-ID: <1993Aug19.120938.5462@janix.pcs.dec.com>
Lines: 45
Sender: uli@cats.muh.dec.com (Ul[r]i[ch] Wendl)
Reply-To: uw@decum.enet.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment  Munich  Germany
X-Newsreader: mxrn 6.18-5
References: <55270001@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM> <24gnu4$skm@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <24m779$b0h@isolar.Tujunga.CA.US> <BDC.93Aug15214130@transit.ai.mit.edu> <24rbb5$t51@hrd769.brooks.af.mil> <24vd7h$frk@horus.mch.sni.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1993 12:09:38 GMT


In article <24vd7h$frk@horus.mch.sni.de>,
	Martin.Kraemer@mch.sni.de (Martin Kraemer) writes:
>...
>Dave Burgess (burgess@hrd769.brooks.af.mil) wrote:
>: Most of Europe seems to have adopted Linux as their system of choice.  I
>: expect that this is (in part, at least) to the fact that Linus is from
>: Europe.  Why put up with those silly export restrictions and long
>: distance network connections when Linux is available right there on the
>: continent.  
>
>Nope. I ("we  europeans") had  access to  386bsd as well  as to  Linux.
>[[Also these "export restrictions" on  DES etc are really just  a joke.
>Every   mailbox   or   ftp   server   offers   you   a   multitude   of
>better-than-original  crypt software packages  like ufscypt  etc.]] The
>reason that I decided to go the Linux way was the sheer size of 386bsd.
>In order to get  a running system plus kernel sources, you  just need a
>hard disk with a size multiple of what you need for Linux. When I first
>installed  Linux (Oct/Nov. 1992), it was so  slender that you could get
>all  the base utilities including cc,  emacs and kernel sources into as
>much as a 32 MB hard disk!
>
>Plus there is  much more support for  "cheap" hardware and for  two-or-
>more-OS's-on-one-harddisk. Traditionally, when you wanted UN*X, you had
>to buy the hardware  that was supported. And  imho, 386bsd still has  a
>bit of this attitude. Linux goes the other way: it makes  the OS run on
>the hardware you've already got.
>
>    Martin

Exactly!!

Or maybe the [386]bsd[386] suffer from the
association with one specific instruction set?

	[hey, finally I've a 486 now!]

Or are there just so many Linus, Charlie Brown, Snoopy,... fans around?  :^)

	Uli
--
===================================                     \|/
watch out for MouseShit on your PC!                    (o o)
===================================================oOO==(_)==OOo================
=