*BSD News Article 20126


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc:18365 comp.os.386bsd.questions:4692
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU!werple.apana.org.au!hal9000!apanix!apanix!not-for-mail
From: hart@apanix.apana.org.au (Leigh Hart)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Data transfer rates - strange differences!
Date: 28 Aug 1993 20:24:41 +1030
Organization: APANIX Public Access Unix, Australia, +61-8-373-5485 (3 lines)
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <25na11$51s@olivaw.apanix.apana.org.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: olivaw.apanix.apana.org.au
Keywords: ftp, tcp, transfer rates


I've been testing data transfer rates (using ftp's *totally* difinative 
*wry smile* judgement of speed) on my 386bsd system.

Basically, my network consists of two 386's, one running DOS, the other
running 386bsd.  Both have identical configurations otherwise.  I'm 
using two clone NE2000 cards, with one segment of thin ethernet.

Now, using NCSA's FTPBIN.EXE on DOS, I can ftp to the 386bsd PC, and
the data transfer rates never get much above 21.5 k/second.  This is
with both 'put' and 'get'.

Conversely, using NCSA's TELBIN.EXE on DOS (which has a built in ftp
server) I can ftp from the 386bsd PC to the DOS PC, and the data
transfer rates make it up as far as 65 k/second.

Another test situation was when I used the same LAN card in another
386bsd system (a 486dx) with the same coax etc, ftp was still limited
between the two 386bsd systems at about 60 k/second.

Now I finally discovered that something was wrong when I took my 386bsd
system to a friend's house and hooked up to his lan (which consists
of a MicroVax II running Ultrix and an Encore MultiMax (310?) running
Umax (a BSD derivative).

Using ftp from my 386bsd system to the MultiMax, I got transfer rates
over and above 400 k/second.

Now why can't I get the same on my local ethernet here at home?!  It can't
be that the 386 won't handle high transfer rates, because it did nicely
from the MultiMax.  Is it due to the packet driver on the DOS PC slowing
things down?  If that's the cause, then why between two 386bsd systems
is the transfer rate equally as slow?

I gather that the NCSA software could be responsible for some of the 
lack of speed, but if one 386bsd system can get 400+ k/second to a
MultiMax, why can't it get the same to another 386bsd system?

Stwange bunnies.

Cheers

Leigh
--
hart@eppie.apana.org.au
hart@apanix.apana.org.au
Allandrick The Fluffy Rabbit Lives!