*BSD News Article 20280


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!news.uiowa.edu!news.weeg.uiowa.edu!jboggs
From: jboggs@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu (John D. Boggs)
Subject: Re: Can cpu "I386_CPU" be removed for a 486?
Message-ID: <1993Sep2.125140.22053@news.weeg.uiowa.edu>
Sender: jboggs@news.weeg.uiowa.edu (John D. Boggs)
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
References: <MYCROFT.93Sep2030413@trinity.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1993 12:51:40 GMT
Lines: 16

From article <MYCROFT.93Sep2030413@trinity.gnu.ai.mit.edu>, by mycroft@trinity.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum):
> 
>    since I am running a 486DX.  I'm assuming I also do not need the
>    emulation code.      ~~~~~
> 
> Theoretically, yes.  (Or, that was the idea, and it seems to work for
> us.  B-))  What you're really referring to is the option
> `MATH_EMULATE', though.  Some 486s do not have floating point.
> 

I thought DX implied floating point, that's why I spent the extra cash.
Have I made a boo-boo? :)

-- 
John D. Boggs     jdb@erato.iowa-city.ia.us
                  or  ...!access1!erato!jdb