*BSD News Article 20330


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!library.ucla.edu!news.mic.ucla.edu!magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!cd27+
From: Christopher Dalton <cd27+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: [SUMMARY] NetBSD-0.9 partitioning
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1993 20:59:19 -0400
Organization: Doctoral student, Mathematics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <747017959.22507.0@unix10.andrew.cmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: andrew.cmu.edu

Thanks to everyone that replied.

Since several people sent me mail saying they also wanted the answers, I 
thought I would post a summary.

Late last night, I wrote:

>Please pardon me for having no clue:
>
>1.  When I use fdisk to create a partition for NetBSD, what kind of
>partition should I create?  Fdisk wont create a non-dos partition 
>... ?
>
>2.  Fdisk doesn't tell me the offset or precise size, how do I 
>figure them out?  (It doesn't mention cylinders at all, only K.)
>
>3.  I should make the partition of type 0xA5 with a partition 
>editor; where can I find one (ftp)? 
>
>4.  Why can't NetBSD use the same install procedure as 386BSD (which
>didn't require a clue)?

Answers:

1,2,3.  Get a nice partition editor such as 'pfdisk' (Available at 
uceng.uc.edu in /pub/wuarchive/systems/linux/INSTALL/dos_utils and
doubtless many other places).  Use it to create the partition.  Said 
program works in cyls (not Megs or % or other fuzzy stuff), and there 
is no problem writing whatever you want for the partition type (in 
this case decimal 165).  If you write down the information from the 
pfdisk "l" command, you will have all the numbers you need to follow 
the installation notes.

4.  Because the 386BSD installation procedure sucks the big wazoo.
Basically the 386BSD procedure is inflexible, not allowing to user to
choose swap partition size or much of anything.  Could a procedure be
written that is as flexible as NetBSD and as nice as 386BSD?  Prolly.  
Is it a priority?  Not for me to decide.  (There has been some debate
about installation in this group.)

Note: shouldn't pfdisk or something similar be put in  
.../NetBSD-0.9/utilities ?