Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:12534 comp.os.linux:54366 comp.os.386bsd.misc:852
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!agate.berkeley.edu!cgd
From: cgd@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: Re: BSD UNIX
Date: 3 Sep 93 16:05:17
Organization: Kernel Hackers 'r' Us
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <CGD.93Sep3160517@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <newmanCCL33A.GBo@netcom.com> <GOWEN.93Aug30234233@apex.cs.tufts.edu>
<1993Aug31.185019.22189@sophia.smith.edu>
<MUTS.93Sep2205147@compi.hobby.nl>
<michaelv.747084422@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: erewhon.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: michaelv@iastate.edu's message of Fri, 3 Sep 1993 19:27:02 GMT
In article <michaelv.747084422@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu> michaelv@iastate.edu (Michael L. VanLoon) writes:
> [ "NetBSD is..." ]
> d) Buildable on as many architectures as possible
>(386/486 currently in production, Amiga & HP300 in beta, many others
>in alpha testing).
actually:
i[34]86 "production"
amiga "production"
mac beta but binaries available
hp300 beta
pc532 late development (it boots, etc., but is missing
important drivers)
sparc development (it almost boots)
sun3 early development
and there are others that i'm missing...
re: amiga: just because binaries aren't available on -lamp doesn't
mean it's not in production use... there are many places carrying
binaries for it in europe, but their names all escape me right now...
chris
--
chris g. demetriou cgd@cs.berkeley.edu
smarter than your average clam.