*BSD News Article 20413


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:12546 comp.os.linux:54379 comp.os.386bsd.misc:862
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!uum1!salsa!gorp.ssesco.com!rhealey
From: rhealey@gorp.ssesco.com (Rob Healey)
Subject: Re: BSD UNIX
Message-ID: <CCu0s1.29o@ssesco.com>
Sender: news@ssesco.com
Organization: SSESCO
References: <michaelv.747084422@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu>> <CGD.93Sep3160517@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <michaelv.747102277@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1993 13:43:12 GMT
Lines: 22

In article <michaelv.747102277@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu> michaelv@iastate.edu (Michael L. VanLoon) writes:
>In <CGD.93Sep3160517@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU> cgd@erewhon.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou) writes:
>
>>	amiga		"production"
>
>>re: amiga: just because binaries aren't available on -lamp doesn't
>>mean it's not in production use...  there are many places carrying
>>binaries for it in europe, but their names all escape me right now...
>
>Finally, a reason to buy an Amiga... :-)  I'm almost tempted.
>
	Hey now! B^). I'll pit the 3000's 0.9 I/O performance against any
	386 or 486 based system any day!

	I hear the screen/console code doesn't take full advantage of
	the hardware yet tho. And there is the issue of shared, or
	better yet dynamic, librarys.

	I run SVR4 on my Amiga tho so I'm not 100% up to date on 0.9's
	status.

		-Rob