Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:12568 comp.os.linux:54481 comp.os.386bsd.misc:900 Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!news-feed-2.peachnet.edu!umn.edu!uum1!salsa!gorp.ssesco.com!rhealey From: rhealey@gorp.ssesco.com (Rob Healey) Subject: Re: BSD UNIX Message-ID: <CCyo6n.LMK@ssesco.com> Sender: news@ssesco.com Organization: SSESCO References: <michaelv.747102277@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu> <CCu0s1.29o@ssesco.com> <CCuHI1.M97@eunet.ch> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1993 01:59:11 GMT Lines: 21 In article <CCuHI1.M97@eunet.ch> mw@eunet.ch (Markus Wild) writes: >> Hey now! B^). I'll pit the 3000's 0.9 I/O performance against any >> 386 or 486 based system any day! >> [ stuff deleted ] >> I run SVR4 on my Amiga tho so I'm not 100% up to date on 0.9's >> status. > >Huh.. take care Rob.. The A3000 does indeed have nice I/O performance, >but you won't exploit it with Amiga SVR4.. this one contains one of the >most dreadful implementations of a scsi driver I've seen on the amiga... > I base that bold claim on tests done on a friends machine and not mine. I took care to say the 0.9 SCSI driver would put ISA/EISA based SCSI I/O to shame. I agree the SVR4 driver is the most pathetic excuse for a SCSI driver I've seen in my entire life. Thanks for the info relative to the other aspects of the port. -Rob