*BSD News Article 20709


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:4955 comp.os.386bsd.misc:936
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!yeshua.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!caen!usenet.coe.montana.edu!bsd.coe.montana.edu!nate
From: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: A merge of FreeBSD and NetBSD? (One person's opinion)
Date: 10 Sep 1993 07:04:53 GMT
Organization: Montana State University, Bozeman  MT
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <26p8ul$1eb@pdq.coe.montana.edu>
References: <1993Sep8.231610.9740@ccds3.ntu.edu.tw> <CD190K.FwG@latcs1.lat.oz.au> <CD3JII.F5w.1@cs.cmu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bsd.coe.montana.edu

In article <CD3JII.F5w.1@cs.cmu.edu>, Robert Baron <rvb+@cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
>My best advice is to just wait.  I've heard on some other news
>groups that FreeBSD and NetBSD are going to merge together soon.
>I'd like to hear that confirmed here.

You heard Jordan's words already on what is going/not-going to happen.

>Well, which kernel do I hack to fix this?

You hack whichever kernel you feel most comfortable in, and if you're code
is good then both the NetBSD and FreeBSD folks will use it.  I think the
diversity has helped in many ways, as it has caused both groups to see things
that the other group has been lacking in.

Opinion follows:

For one example of this.

I believe the FreeBSD folks do a better job of packaging the release into
a more palatable state for users to use, while the NetBSD spend more time
trying to make the system into a more palatable system for developer's to
use.  It's just a difference in priorities.

This isn't to say that the FreeBSD folks don't care what the system looks
like, nor does it imply that the NetBSD folks don't package their system
well, it's just that the amount of time spent in those areas are different
for the different groups.

Alot of folks may say, "Hey, you should get together, since you do
different things, and together you could be a better team".  That may be
true, but because of those strengths, I (a lame kernel hacker by all
standards) would never be allowed to touch the kernel again.  Right now,
I like being a little fish in a small pond.  But, if I were to join
NetBSD today, I (have been told) that I am to keep my grubby little
fingers out of the kernel.  So, I choose to stay where I only get yelled
at for doing stupid kernel changes, (but at least I can make them. :-)

So, more than just talents are at stake.  I *like* playing with *BSD.  I
haven't gotten a dime since I started doing this when 0.1 was released,
and I don't expect to get anything.  So, when it starts becoming less
fun, it's not worth it to me.

A merge may happen, and then again, it may not.  But, I don't think
anyone is *losing* out except for those folks who think there has to be
one unified release.  If you want one unified release, buy BSDI.  There
release is a lot less fragmented and more stable than any of the free
versions.  In the meantime, I'm gonna have some fun, and learn on the
way.  If you like what I do, I'm more than welcome to share it with you,
and even ask for your help, but you don't have to accept my work, or
even like it for me to feel fulfilled.  (But I *do* appreciate when
people appreciate me and my work. :-)

Off my soap-box and off to bed,


Nate
-- 
nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu     |  In the middle of it ........ again. 
nate@cs.montana.edu          |  Running/supporting one of many freely available 
work #: (406) 994-4836       |  Operating Systems for [34]86 machines.
home #: (406) 586-0579       |  (based on Net/2, name changes all the time :-)
-- 
nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu     |  In the middle of it ........ again. 
nate@cs.montana.edu          |  Running/supporting one of many freely available 
work #: (406) 994-4836       |  Operating Systems for [34]86 machines.
home #: (406) 586-0579       |  (based on Net/2, name changes all the time :-)