Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:4996 comp.os.386bsd.misc:953 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!library.ucla.edu!news.mic.ucla.edu!unixg.ubc.ca!acs.ucalgary.ca!cpsc.ucalgary.ca!xenlink!fsa.ca!deraadt From: deraadt@fsa.ca (Theo de Raadt) Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs NetBSD 0.9, wait? [was: Re: from 386bsd0.1 to FreeBSD or NetBSD 0.9] In-Reply-To: alm@netcom.com's message of Sat, 11 Sep 1993 03: 27:53 GMT Message-ID: <DERAADT.93Sep10232713@newt.fsa.ca> Sender: news@fsa.ca Nntp-Posting-Host: newt.fsa.ca Organization: little lizard city References: <CD190K.FwG@latcs1.lat.oz.au> <CD3JII.F5w.1@cs.cmu.edu> <JKH.93Sep9215356@whisker.lotus.ie> <almCD66yI.6LH@netcom.com> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1993 06:27:13 GMT Lines: 10 In article <almCD66yI.6LH@netcom.com> alm@netcom.com (Andrew Moore) writes: In the mean time, I think it is safe to say that FreeBSD is putting more effort into i386-specific support. In the meantime, I think it's completely stupid to say anything of the kind. I hope you've fixed the swtch() bug in locore.s, BTW. -- This space not left unintentionally unblank. deraadt@fsa.ca