Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:4997 comp.os.386bsd.misc:954 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!usenet.coe.montana.edu!bsd.coe.montana.edu!nate From: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Comparing anything to NetBSD Date: 11 Sep 1993 18:29:17 GMT Organization: Montana Stateu University, Bozeman MT Lines: 27 Message-ID: <26t5dt$80e@pdq.coe.montana.edu> References: <CD190K.FwG@latcs1.lat.oz.au> <JKH.93Sep9215356@whisker.lotus.ie> <almCD66yI.6LH@netcom.com> <DERAADT.93Sep10232713@newt.fsa.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: bsd.coe.montana.edu In article <DERAADT.93Sep10232713@newt.fsa.ca>, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@fsa.ca> wrote: >In article <almCD66yI.6LH@netcom.com> alm@netcom.com (Andrew Moore) writes: > In the mean time, I think it is safe to say that FreeBSD is putting > more effort into i386-specific support. > >In the meantime, I think it's completely stupid to say anything of the >kind. > >I hope you've fixed the swtch() bug in locore.s, BTW. In general, you can ignore anything Theo says after you make any comparisons to NetBSD, because NetBSD is perfect, and anything that is compared to NetBSD is a piece of s*it. (And you will notice little digs anytime you compare anything to NetBSD) But, he is a pretty good hacker, so most of the time it makes up for it. Nate (Hi Theo, can't wait for the response to this one ;-) -- nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu | In the middle of it ........ again. nate@cs.montana.edu | Running/supporting one of many freely available work #: (406) 994-4836 | Operating Systems for [34]86 machines. home #: (406) 586-0579 | (based on Net/2, name changes all the time :-)