*BSD News Article 20961


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:5102 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1009
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!umd5.umd.edu!roissy.umd.edu!mark
From: mark@roissy.umd.edu (Mark Sienkiewicz)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: 386BSD 0.1 must die ( was Re: FreeBSD vs NetBSD etc.)
Date: 14 Sep 1993 19:41:03 GMT
Organization: University of Maryland
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <2756of$73g@umd5.umd.edu>
References: <CD7rGD.2p3@taronga.com> <hastyCD8A1E.9AA@netcom.com> <1993Sep13.121342.3732@cm.cf.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: roissy.umd.edu

>>386bsd-0.1
>>386bsd-0.1  + random patches 
>>386bsd-0.1  + patchkit 
>
>Well, let's face it, with FreeBSD and NetBSD now out there I think we should
>forget about 0.1 and any patches that go with it. Even Bill doesn't think 0.1
>is in a fit state to be usable and the patchkit mechanism, while it it
>served us well for a while, should now be quickly forgotten about.

The way to make this happen is to remove it from the archive sites.

Consider this typical scenario-

	Somebody hears about 386bsd, maybe at a party, maybe from a back
	issue of DDJ, maybe it was a few months ago, but now's the time
	to check it out.

	% archie 386bsd
	>>tons of archive sites reported<<
	
	% Pnews
	Subject: I can't get 386bsd 0.1 to work...

If you are an archive operator, at least put a note in the 386bsd tree
that points out that it is obsolete and directs people to Netbsd and Freebsd.
If you know an archive operator, please pass the word along.