Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:5277 comp.os.386bsd.development:1241 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!xlink.net!news.dfn.de!server2.rz.uni-leipzig.de!RNEWS.urz.tu-dresden.de!irz401!uriah!not-for-mail From: j@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de (J Wunsch) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.development Subject: Re: Epson LQ printer - Can it be done? Date: 22 Sep 1993 11:37:11 +0200 Organization: Textil Computer Design GmbH Dresden, Germany Lines: 38 Message-ID: <27p6c7INN6va@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de> References: <TONY.93Sep9182513@marge.apana.org.au> <1993Sep11.124630.22284@gmd.de> <279b1mINNjgb@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de> <1993Sep16.115459.24351@gmd.de> <27at11$juc@pdq.coe.montana.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: bonnie.tcd-dresden.de In <27at11$juc@pdq.coe.montana.edu>, nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) writes: >[ LPT bugs ] >In article <1993Sep16.115459.24351@gmd.de>, >Holger Veit <veit@mururoa.gmd.de> wrote: >>2. If this is a bug, and everyone agrees that it is, why the hell hasn't >> someone digged into that and tried to correct this? >The same reason that the wd driver is still buggy. Because the folks that >fix such things don't need it, and are busy fixing other things they feel >are more important. [db code fixed] >that those things are important. I would venture to say that those >things are much more important to them than fixing lpt bugs. Yes and no. Since i'm running BSD here on the local network's printer server, i'm stuck there to 386BSD/0.2.2. (Btw., the lpd server runs fine.) Okay, i've been too lazy personally. I always hoped someone else would find the bug... Now i realize, it's on me to fix it if i wanna have it. On the other hand: there are so much other things, look for the fd driver, for example. That's one of the reasons i didn't start to investigate. But the day will come. >I agree totally. When first setting up my 386BSD 0.1 box ages ago, I found >out that my printer was absolutely and totally mis-configured (I think it >was wired to my COM IRQ), but both my com driver and my lpt worked under >DOS. (how, I'll never now) But: my printer/card/cable/driver ran till i patched to 0.2.4. So i've been hoping for some wizard that introduced the bug... -- in real life: J"org Wunsch | ) o o | primary: joerg_wunsch@tcd-dresden.de above 1.8 MHz: DL 8 DTL | ) | | private: joerg_wunsch@uriah.sax.de | . * ) == | ``An elephant is a mouse with an operating system.''