Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!news.uiowa.edu!news.weeg.uiowa.edu!jboggs
From: jboggs@umaxc.weeg.uiowa.edu (John D. Boggs)
Subject: Re: Patchkit folks, get FreeBSD! (was:[386bsd] ghostscript 2.5.2 epson driver)
Message-ID: <1993Sep22.225511.10732@news.weeg.uiowa.edu>
Sender: jboggs@news.weeg.uiowa.edu (John D. Boggs)
Organization: University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
References: <MYCROFT.93Sep22153826@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1993 22:55:11 GMT
Lines: 14
From article <MYCROFT.93Sep22153826@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu>, by mycroft@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum):
>
> As a point of reference: I have had no trouble at all with any
> non-broken third party programs under NetBSD since the various sh bugs
> were fixed. (Some of these bug fixes were not in 0.9 and are not yet
> in FreeBSD.) And I have compiled a *lot* of third party software, on
> both the i386 and hp300 ports...
>
Is it safe to assume that these sh fixes you refer to are in NetBSD-current?
Or would I be wasting my time downloading the sh sources there?
--
John D. Boggs jdb@erato.iowa-city.ia.us
or ...!access1!erato!jdb