Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!cert!netnews.upenn.edu!uofs!prijat.cs.uofs.edu!bill
From: bill@prijat.cs.uofs.edu (Bill Gunshannon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: Announcing 386BSD Release 0.1
Message-ID: <10916@platypus.uofs.uofs.edu>
Date: 21 Jul 92 17:27:16 GMT
References: <14cuvtINN568@agate.berkeley.edu> <1992Jul20.135540.12384@uvm.edu>
Sender: news@uofs.uofs.edu
Reply-To: bill@platypus.uofs.edu
Organization: University of Scranton, Scranton, PA
Lines: 17
Nntp-Posting-Host: prijat.cs.uofs.edu
In article <1992Jul20.135540.12384@uvm.edu>, wollman@trantor.emba.uvm.edu (Garrett Wollman) writes:
|>
|> 3. As far as everybody who is not employed by AT&T and its
|> licensees is concerned, BSD *is* UNIX, whether it actually contains
|> AT&T code or not.
|>
I believe that AT&T has started a lawsuit against BSDI that is going to
put an end to this idea real quick. If it don't say AT&T, it ain't UNIX.
bill
--
Bill Gunshannon | If this statement wasn't here,
bill@platypus.uofs.edu | This space would be left intentionally blank
bill@tuatara.uofs.edu | #include <std.disclaimer.h>