*BSD News Article 22084


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:1183 comp.os.linux:55977
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!uw-beaver!cmaeda
From: cmaeda@cs.washington.edu (Chris Maeda)
Subject: Re: NetBSD TCP/IP network benchmarks
Message-ID: <1993Oct8.183048.24638@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
Sender: news@beaver.cs.washington.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U. of Washington, Seattle
References: <MYCROFT.93Oct6054959@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> <1993Oct8.085554.9345@beaver.cs.washington.edu> <294371$aga@pdq.coe.montana.edu>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 93 18:30:48 GMT
Lines: 24

In article <294371$aga@pdq.coe.montana.edu> osyjm@cs.montana.edu (Jaye Mathisen) writes:
>In article <1993Oct8.085554.9345@beaver.cs.washington.edu>,
>Chris Maeda <cmaeda@cs.washington.edu> wrote:
>>
>>system			codebase	kbytes/s
>>
>>NetBSD 0.8		BNR2		320		
>
>Well, rampant speculation might place the blame on your cards, or perhaps
>an outdated driver, I know David has spent a lot of time on some of
>the network drivers, better performance is likely.

The cards are probably responsible for the slow (300-400 kbyte/s)
performance in general but they definitely have nothing to do with the
difference between the various OS's.  All my experiments were run on
the same two boxes; I booted off a different partition for each OS.

>I regularly get 400+k/sec out of my cheapo DEC DEPCA card on a 386-20sx
>with FreeBSD, and I don't think there are enough significant differences
>between NetBSD 0.8 and FreeBSD for it to be attributable to the OS.

Is this card 8bit or 16 bit?