Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:1187 comp.os.linux:55994
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!koriel!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!xlink.net!math.fu-berlin.de!news.rrz.uni-hamburg.de!lutzifer!wavehh.hanse.de!wolfhh!umibox!root
From: root@umibox.hanse.de (Bernd Meyer)
Subject: Re: FYI.. benchmarks on linux and 386bsd
References: <2CB12A8D.17397@news.service.uci.edu> <MARK_WEAVER.93Oct5175919@excelsior.cis.brown.edu>
Organization: String to put in the Organization Header
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1993 12:57:45 GMT
Message-ID: <1993Oct7.125745.28750@umibox.hanse.de>
Lines: 19
Mark_Weaver@brown.edu writes:
>In article <2CB12A8D.17397@news.service.uci.edu> jstern@aris.ss.uci.edu (Jeff Stern) writes:
>> These are two different dhrystone benchmarks, and a dhampstone
>> benchmark which I compiled both under gcc (without optimization) on
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>You you were running gcc version 1 (the default that comes with
>386bsd 0.1) then that explains it. gcc2 has a significantly better
>optimizer that could easily explain this kind of speed difference.
^^^^^^^^
Something is striking me odd here.....
Bernie
--
We both know that the earth is round | Bernd Meyer, EE-student
So we can't see the way before us to its end | "Nobody is a failure who has
We walk on this way, hand in hand, | friends" (from: "It's a
And I hope you are still with me behind the horizon| wonderful life")