Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!crcnis1.unl.edu!wupost!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!library.ucla.edu!agate!agate.berkeley.edu!cgd
From: cgd@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: Re: WILL ???BSD DIE?
Date: 2 Nov 93 16:50:24
Organization: Kernel Hackers 'r' Us
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <CGD.93Nov2165024@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <jmonroyCFv39C.Iv1@netcom.com> <2b64ce$l4o@zip.eecs.umich.edu>
<2b6o4p$15s@pdq.coe.montana.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eden.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu's message of 2 Nov 1993 22:48:57 GMT
In article <2b6o4p$15s@pdq.coe.montana.edu> nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) writes:
>I doubt that ANYBODIES machine has the load that freefall or
>sun-lamp gets though (the FreeBSD and NetBSD development machines).
i'd tend to agree with this, otherwise we would have heard a lot of
bug reports about bugs that the FreeBSD or NetBSD teams have found
and fixed 'on our own.'
lamp had an average uptime of 'a couple of hours' before 0.8.
now it's in 'days'.
chris
--
chris g. demetriou cgd@cs.berkeley.edu
smarter than your average clam.