Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:12918 comp.os.386bsd.development:1415 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:1788 comp.os.386bsd.apps:659 comp.os.386bsd.questions:6737 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1471 Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.bugs,comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!crcnis1.unl.edu!wupost!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!jmonroy From: jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) Subject: Re: [RFD] Election of a new Moderator Message-ID: <jmonroyCGAv7K.D4H@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8] References: <1993Nov9.191735.16656@pony.Ingres.COM> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1993 23:42:55 GMT Lines: 27 Gregory Altman (galtman@Ingres.COM) wrote: : Jesus Monroy Jr (jmonroy@netcom.com) wrote: : : : : RFD : : Request For Discussion : : Election of a new moderator : There is no need to elect a new moderator when the current one is doing : an excellent job. : I think that your definition of excellent needs to be reviewed, at least in this case. : There were some points of conflict listed. I agree that there MAY be a : case of contention between the goals of the 386bsd and the moderator of : announce. That DOES NOT mean that the moderator will let his personal : feelings interfere with his responsibilities. : I think that the oppisite (sp?) can be proven quite regularly. : I feel that it is the 386bsd group that has lost credibility by keeping : silent, and not making the announcements of delays/progress. (And yes, : we all appreciate the original effort, but NetBSD is today, and 386bsd : seems to have left the realm of the real world.) : I disagree. I beleive the "real world" does not live on the "net".