Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:12931 comp.os.386bsd.development:1427 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:1801 comp.os.386bsd.apps:672 comp.os.386bsd.questions:6760 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1491
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.bugs,comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!pacbell.com!amdahl!netcomsv!netcom.com!jmonroy
From: jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr)
Subject: Re: Evidence to the moderators conflict-of-interest
Message-ID: <jmonroyCGB3wn.JFJ@netcom.com>
Followup-To: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.bugs,comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
References: <1993Nov10.200002.18315@oz.plymouth.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1993 02:50:47 GMT
Lines: 61
mail ted@oz.plymouth.edu
Re: Subject: Re: Evidence to the moderators conflict-of-interest
>> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 93 20:00:02 GMT
>>
>> In article <jmonroyCG9v5u.K7D@netcom.com> jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) writes:
>>
>> [Lots deleted]
>>
>> Come on. Don't we all have better things to do. Many of us
>> have lives outside of work/computing. I know I do many other things
>> in my spare time other than tweaking kernels, etc... Give the guy
>> a break if it waits two days or so, You have no idea what he has to do.
>> I know some messages I get wind up waiting, it depends on how important
>> they are.
>>
I think you were speaking to me.
If so, you've mis-interpeted the context of the message.
Albeit, the moderator is trying his best to derail the subject
with half sentences and name-calling, the fact is
he is acting with a conflict-of-interest. Please,
take this into account. I have no other quarrels
with the moderator, except his conflict-of-interest
>> I have one piece of advice: Don't burn your bridges as you
>> may need to turn back.
>>
Some bridges must burn well, but in this case I have
set no flames to blaze (except this thread maybe).
>> No one says you have to agree with everything,
>> but going off half cocked does nothing more than discredit yourself.
>>
Half-cocked?
I think you've missed the point.
I will be happy to repeat the circumstances as
they happen it you like.z
>> If everyone learns to dred seeing your name, chances are they will
>> not take what you have to say too seriously.
>>
Everyone, us, we. Do any of the poeple have names?
I get these message all the time.
I am thinking the issues are being crowded with side-issues.
Namely, if I disagree with everyone then I must
be an idiot or a fool.
Everyone has an opinion. They are free to express it
in my presence. If I don't like the opinion I will
not listen. I know these as facts.
___________________________________________________________________________
Jesus Monroy Jr jmonroy@netcom.com
Zebra Research
/386BSD/device-drivers /fd /qic /clock /documentation
___________________________________________________________________________