Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve news.groups:79331 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1516 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!alanc From: alanc@OCF.Berkeley.EDU (Alan Coopersmith) Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: RFD: comp.unix.advocacy Followup-To: news.groups Date: 12 Nov 1993 17:30:44 GMT Organization: U.C. Bezerkeley Overloaded Computing Facility Lines: 16 Message-ID: <2c0h84$6t0@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <comp.unix.advocacy-RFD1@uunet.uu.net> Reply-To: alanc@ocf.berkeley.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: maelstrom-ether.berkeley.edu cks@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu (Chris Siebenmann) writes in news.groups: |PROPOSED GROUP: comp.unix.advocacy (unmoderated) | | For discussions of the form 'Unix sucks!', 'Unix rules!', 'Unix is |obsolete!', 'Unix is better/worse than system X', and similar. Can we add the 386BSD vs. NetBSD/FreeBSD flames in there too? There's not really enough call to create a group for the one person who keeps posting them. (And is there any way to convince netcom to force all jmonroy's postings to end up there and only there?) -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alan Coopersmith Internet: alanc@ocf.berkeley.edu U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility Bitnet: alanc@ucbocf