Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:12951 comp.os.386bsd.development:1445 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:1817 comp.os.386bsd.apps:689 comp.os.386bsd.questions:6821 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1523 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!nic.csu.net!nermal.santarosa.edu!ccowart Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.bugs,comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: Evidence to the moderators conflict-of-interest Message-ID: <1993Nov12.111428.7426@nic.csu.net> From: ccowart@nermal.santarosa.edu (Charles Cowart) Date: 12 Nov 93 11:14:25 PST References: <CGD.93Nov10041331@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <jmonroyCGB3J9.IK2@netcom.com> Organization: Santa Rosa Junior College, Santa Rosa, CA Nntp-Posting-Host: nermal.santarosa.edu Lines: 21 You know it's funny, Jesus, how you try to use big, eloquent wording, and bloated statements to make your arguements sound official and important. Yet you frequently misspell common words. You rag the moderator over his use of past participles, and yet you can't even understand the difference between 'your' and 'you're'. > You have to past participles that contradict your statement, > namely, "I *responded* as soon as I *decided*". > Please clarify your statement so that I may correctly > interpet your meaning; I am a bit confused. I suppose it's easy for you to become confused. You can't even figure out how when to use 'two' instead of 'to'. Your attempts at portraying yourself as some indisputed god of intellect are a dismal failure. Why can't you get it through your thick skull? Nobody cares about what you're (not your) saying. You're taking this entire issue WAY too far. You hum 'conflict-of-interest' like it was your mantra, thinking that's going to lock it in for the rest of us. Sorry. I'm smart enough to know that I can sit here and scream, "GO AWAY!" all day, and it wouldn't do a blessed bit of good.