Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:6840 comp.infosystems.www:3048 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!mcsun!ieunet!news.ieunet.ie!jkh From: jkh@whisker.lotus.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.infosystems.www Subject: Re: Mosaic 2.0 for FreeBSD? Date: 14 Nov 1993 11:47:03 GMT Organization: Lotus Development Ireland Lines: 20 Distribution: world Message-ID: <JKH.93Nov14034703@whisker.lotus.ie> References: <CGDrpz.D7L@cosy.sbg.ac.at> <CGEuMC.3H4@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <CGGI1G.Cp7@festival.ed.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: whisker.lotus.ie In-reply-to: richard@castle.ed.ac.uk's message of Sun, 14 Nov 1993 00:44:04 GMT In article <CGGI1G.Cp7@festival.ed.ac.uk> richard@castle.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) writes: >>Since Mosaic 2.0 is out I'd like to know if anybody has it >>already compiled *statically* for FreeBSD? >Doesn't Mosaic 2.0 require Motif? Yes, that's why he wants it statically compiled! To make this plainer - I have xmosaic 2.0 compiled with Motif 1.2, but I *cannot* give it out due to the new OSF copyright which explicitly states that you cannot give out motif code in any binary form, whether it be a motif library or an executable linked statically with it, without first paying some sort of license fee on it. Jordan -- (Jordan K. Hubbard) jkh@violet.berkeley.edu, jkh@al.org, jkh@whisker.lotus.ie I do not speak for Lotus, nor am I even a Lotus employee. I am an independent contractor.