*BSD News Article 24129


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:6950 comp.unix.osf.osf1:1422 comp.periphs.scsi:15406
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.unix.osf.osf1,comp.periphs.scsi
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!mimosa.astro.indiana.edu!pitts
From: pitts@mimosa.astro.indiana.edu (Jim Pitts)
Subject: Re: Driver for Adaptec 274xT
Message-ID: <CGn3Jw.CH7@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
Nntp-Posting-Host: mimosa.astro.indiana.edu
Organization: Indiana University Astronomy Department
References: <Egsycda00WBO06zWdV@andrew.cmu.edu> <CGEzo0.GJr@tsoft.net> <2cck7l$npn@u.cc.utah.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1993 14:14:19 GMT
Lines: 40

In article <2cck7l$npn@u.cc.utah.edu>,
A Wizard of Earth C <terry@cs.weber.edu> wrote:
>In article <CGEzo0.GJr@tsoft.net> tedm@tsoft.net (Ted Matsumura) writes:
>]>adaptec
>]> i
>]> a
>]> m
>]> o
>]> n
>]> d
>]>
>]>just a coincidence?  you decide.
>]
>]I don't get it, what is the significance of "diamond" ?
>
>
>Alternate monitor frequencies are required to support the higher
>display resoloutions available via BIOS mode settings.  Because
>Diamond will not allow this information out without non-disclosure
>and because they have not written their INT 10 BIOS to operate
>correctly in protected mode, it is impossible to get higher than
>default VGA resoloution on a protected mode OS.
>

Diamond gladly gave me the required information without signing a NDA.
Don't want a fire.  Just want to point out the facts here.  They -did-
refuse to give out this information in the past, but now at least -I-
had no problems.

>
>Similarly, Adaptec has reportedly told several programmers that
>have inquired that programming information for their newer disk
>controllers (such as the AHA2742 EISA controller and the version
>of the same controller for embedded use on motherboards) will
>not be made available except under non-disclosure.
>

This is really a shame.  I wonder when these guys will feel safe enough to
let stuff like this go.