Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uunet!kithrup!sef From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) Subject: Re: AT&T vs. BSDI --> 4.3BSD-NET2 distribution requires AT&T license!!! Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 19:01:43 GMT Message-ID: <1992Jul24.190143.3372@kithrup.COM> References: <87@ampr.ab.ca> <1992Jul23.225144.10832@rice.edu> <1992Jul24.170640.11127@Warren.MENTORG.COM> Lines: 17 In article <1992Jul24.170640.11127@Warren.MENTORG.COM> tal@Warren.MENTORG.COM (Tom Limoncelli) writes: >USL has never sold long distance. You're going after the wrong men in >black hats. (Or, in the case of Plan 9, black space suits) Don't be stupid. AT&T is currently the single largest shareholder of USL; it has a controlling interest, I believe. Therefore, boycotting AT&T long distance communications, and informing AT&T of this, is a valid, proper, and effective way of getting the point across to USL -- as AT&T is the only company that needs to vote to drop the lawsuit. -- Sean Eric Fagan | "My psychiatrist says I have a messiah sef@kithrup.COM | complex. But I forgive him." -----------------+ -- Jim Carrey Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.