Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uunet!gatech!destroyer!fmsrl7!ef2007!mjo
From: mjo@ef2007.efhd.ford.com (Mike O'Connor)
Subject: Re: USL vs. BSDI, and what to do
Message-ID: <Brwuz4.CFt@ef2007.efhd.ford.com>
X-Disclaimer: Not an official spokesperson for Ford OPEO
Reply-To: Mike O'Connor <mjo@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com>
Organization: International Affairs, Overseas Engineering, "Fordz"
References: <l6vrqvINN91g@neuro.usc.edu> <l6vt9sINN93u@neuro.usc.edu> <1992Jul24.170447.11039@Warren.MENTORG.COM>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 20:45:03 GMT
Lines: 26
In article <1992Jul24.170447.11039@Warren.MENTORG.COM> tal@Warren.MENTORG.COM (Tom Limoncelli) writes:
:I hate to say this, but Bob has nothing to do with this. AT&T didn't
:bring the law suit. USL did. USL has a different chair person, and
:has their own lawyers (from what I've heard, they don't share lawyers...
:so much for the "army of lawyers").
Who's the biggest shareholder of USL?
Let's play multiple choice:
a) AT&T
b) American Telephone & Telegraph
c) All of the above
See my point? If USL is hurt, AT&T is hurt and vice versa. I know
that USL was created to distance themselves away from AT&T, but it's
pretty obvious who has the vested interest in the outcome of this suit.
--
Michael J. O'Connor | Internet: mjo@fmsrl7.srl.ford.com
Ford Motor Company, OPEO | UUCP: ...!{backbone}!fmsrl7!mjo
20000 Rotunda, Bldg. 1-3001 | Phone: +1 (313) 248-1260
Dearborn, MI 48121 | Fax: +1 (313) 323-6277