*BSD News Article 25251


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.misc:10641 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:5227 comp.unix.bsd:13166 comp.windows.x.i386unix:6006 biz.sco.general:9626
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!demon!stonewall.demon.co.uk!nigel
Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.bsd,comp.windows.x.i386unix,biz.sco.general
From: nigel@stonewall.demon.co.uk (Nigel Whitfield)
Subject: Re: SCO market share
References: <WAYNE.93Dec17083053@backbone.uucp> <9312210930.aa08217@fags.stonewall.demon.co.uk> <1993Dec22.021625.22831@kf8nh.wariat.org>
Organization: Jenny Agutter Fan Club
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1993 08:43:46 +0000
Message-ID: <9312220843.aa11509@fags.stonewall.demon.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
Lines: 12

In article <1993Dec22.021625.22831@kf8nh.wariat.org> bsa@kf8nh.wariat.org (Brandon S. Allbery) writes:
>
>...after watching both cc and rcc under SCO 3.2.2 really botch up generated
>code, I've been using gcc exclusively.  I haven't tested either under 3.2.4 to
>see if they can be trusted for critical applications yet.

Compilers - who need's em? I'm sure I have one around here on a spare
disk somewhere, but we don't have one in the office. I don't view it
as necessary for running Unix.

Nigel.