Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.misc:10655 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:5231 comp.unix.bsd:13172 comp.windows.x.i386unix:6027 biz.sco.general:9661
Newsgroups: comp.unix.misc,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.bsd,comp.windows.x.i386unix,biz.sco.general
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!news.kei.com!xenitec!camco!bill
From: bill@Celestial.COM (Bill Campbell)
Subject: Re: SCO market share
Organization: Celestial Software, Mercer Island, WA
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1993 18:34:54 GMT
Message-ID: <CIG8yH.CqK@Celestial.COM>
References: <1993Dec15.015758.17502@news.csuohio.edu> <9312160932.aa05151@fags.stonewall.demon.co.uk> <WAYNE.93Dec17083053@backbone.uucp> <9312210930.aa08217@fags.stonewall.demon.co.uk> <1993Dec22.021625.22831@kf8nh.wariat.org>
Lines: 19
In <1993Dec22.021625.22831@kf8nh.wariat.org> bsa@kf8nh.wariat.org (Brandon S. Allbery) writes:
:...after watching both cc and rcc under SCO 3.2.2 really botch up generated
:code, I've been using gcc exclusively. I haven't tested either under 3.2.4 to
:see if they can be trusted for critical applications yet.
I found a problem recently with gcc-2.4.5 and floating point. A
program died a horrible death when compiled with gcc and worked
fine with the stock cc.
I haven't tried gcc 2.5.<whatever it is today> because I want to
see the same version there for a week first.
Bill
--
INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software
UUCP: ...!thebes!camco!bill 8545 SE 68th Street
uunet!camco!bill Mercer Island, WA 98040; (206) 947-5591
SPEED COSTS MONEY -- HOW FAST DO YOU WANT TO GO?