Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!newshost.cs.rose-hulman.edu!news From: mgrjtb@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu Subject: Re: Keeping the AT&T discussion here Message-ID: <1992Jul27.023448.26195@cs.rose-hulman.edu> Sender: news@cs.rose-hulman.edu (The News Administrator) Nntp-Posting-Host: manager.nextwork.rose-hulman.edu Organization: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology References: <l7392fINNf5@neuro.usc.edu> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 02:34:48 GMT Lines: 17 Distribution: world In article <l7392fINNf5@neuro.usc.edu> merlin@neuro.usc.edu (merlin) writes: > >I created alt.suit.att-bsdi for ongoing discussion related to the suit > >between AT&T and BSDI. For sanity's sake, could it please be moved there? If I had just heard of the suit, and was interested -- I would turn here. It is silly to move discussion. 386BSD is much more specific than a AT&T suit against a free distribution of BSD. How about alt.386BSD, or better yet, comp.os.386BSD (but I know that would take some time :-) ) _______________________________ Joseph T. Batt mgrjtb@nextwork.rose-hulman.edu _______________________________