*BSD News Article 2570


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!cujo!marsh!cproto
From: cproto@marsh.cs.curtin.edu.au (Computer Protocol)
Subject: 386bsd-0.1
Message-ID: <cproto.712235554@marsh>
Summary: 386bsd-0.1 a step backward ?
Keywords: 386bsd
Sender: news@cujo.curtin.edu.au (News Manager)
Organization: Curtin University of Technology
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 11:12:34 GMT

Hi there,

after running 386bsd-0.0 since march, 0.1 has not much to offer. Here
is a list of problems, the first is really a showstopper:

1 - large makes hang the system sometimes (try making the kernel a few
times) (the patched 0.0 worked fairly reliable, it started trashing and later
hung when I compiled X11R5)

2 - if fsck fails at the second partition, init continues rather then 
reboot

3 - the com driver looses characters (0.0 hasn't)

4 - ddb is not documented

5 - pccons.c driver delays entered characters until the next char is
typed (sometimes) (0.0 hasn't)

6 - cp is stupid in single user mode ???? (0.0 wasn't)

7 - kern_execve.c doesn't recognize #!/bin/sh (patched 0.0 did)

8 - mtools don't work

9 - kermit is broken in multiple ways


I think I combine the best out of both worlds and run a mix of 0.0 and
0.1.

Regards - Tibor Sashegyi (cproto@abel.cs.curtin.edu.au)