*BSD News Article 26150


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!news.kei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!mimosa.astro.indiana.edu!pitts
From: pitts@mimosa.astro.indiana.edu (Jim Pitts)
Subject: Re: 386BSD on a cheap PC
Message-ID: <CJs1zL.8x3@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
Nntp-Posting-Host: mimosa.astro.indiana.edu
Organization: Indiana University Astronomy Department
References: <1547@thunder.lakeheadu.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 1994 14:09:20 GMT
Lines: 51

In article <1547@thunder.lakeheadu.ca>,
Boris Ivanovic <bivanovi@thunder.LakeheadU.Ca> wrote:
>
>  I have a 386/25 with a 80 MB hard drive.  It seems to me that this system
>is too lowsy to use 386BSD. Am I correct?
>I have the whole system, and unless I did something wrong, full expansion
>is 60MB...
>
>

This is based on the assumption you want a full install.

Looks like you might run into 2 problems.  First, and most obvious is disk
space.  80MB is lean if not enough.  Even if you did manage a full install with
swap space you would have little room for allpication software and expansion
(like XFree86, emacs, etc).

The 3 most active packages out there right now are FreeBSD, NetBSD, and
Linux.  If disk space is a concern Linux seems to be a favorite.  I do not
know how deeply integrated the NetBSD shared libraries are at the current time
but they could make them a close second.  FreeBSD with no shared libraries at
the current release makes it the largest ... for now.

If you DO want to install 386BSD regardless of its current status, you are
about right on target for disk space consumption (altough I am not sure if
this includes the 'etc' distribution or not which is rather large).

So, if 60MB can be done:

80MB  (base)-60(System Software)-8(10% file system size)-8(swap) = 4MB

With some work you can get the 10% disk size down to 5% and still have a
workable file system (there is currently a thread on this topic if you are
intrested).  That might get you 4 back.  8MB of swap is minimal for an 8MB
system and good for a 4MB system.

The next problem is memory.  If you have less than 4 MB, forget it.  If you have
4 MB buy 4 more.  8 is really a comfortable figure, expecially if you are
planning to run X.

The CPU itself is not -that- sad.  I run FreeBSD on a 386-40 and I get quite
good peformance.  The XFree86 software is very impressive, expecially now that
the S3 cards are supported.

Well, my .02 which is seldom worth that much.

-- 
- pitts@mimosa.astro.indiana.edu             ^       | James J. Pitts        -
- Most people are sheep.                    /@\      | IU Physics Dept       -
- Only a select few are fit to rule.       /   \     | Voice:   812-855-8247 -
- We are The Bavarian Illuminati.         /_____\    | FAX  :   812-855-5533 -