Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!news.kei.com!eff!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!mcrcim.mcgill.edu!homer.cs.mcgill.ca!storm From: storm@cs.mcgill.ca (Marc WANDSCHNEIDER) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: NetBSD 0.9 kernel build anomalies Date: 18 Jan 1994 00:00:02 GMT Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, Canada Lines: 30 Message-ID: <2hf8q2$f54@homer.cs.mcgill.ca> References: <1994Jan17.211602.25255@mprgate.mpr.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: mnementh.cs.mcgill.ca In article <1994Jan17.211602.25255@mprgate.mpr.ca>, Dennis Rosenauer <rosenaue@mpr.ca> wrote: >I have just gotten back to working on NetBSD 0.9 and attempted to >re-build the kernel. The kernel builds but there are a farily large >number of warnings from the compiler, mostly about inconsistent type >declarations. > >I am running the "stock" NetBSD 0.9 release. I have not attempted to >go to the "current" level. The hardware is a vanilla 386DX box which >did run 386BSD 0.1 with the various pachkits just fine. > >Is this a common problem with NetBSD? Will moving to the current >mods to NetBSD fix this? How stable is the kernel inspite of the >warning messages? i've been gettingmany of those warnings ever since i started building netbsd kernels in about september. i think the number decreases radically under -current, but stability of the 0.9 kernel in terms of that stuff is fine [there are other problems, but that's not it :-)] marc 'em. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Wandschneider Seattle, WA Barney the Dinosaur sings! You faint... Barney sings! Barney sings! --More-- You Die... --More--