Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!decwrl!nic.hookup.net!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!news2.uunet.ca!fw.novatel.ca!sidney!hpeyerl
From: hpeyerl@sidney (Herb Peyerl)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: <Proposal> Rename of the 386bsd groups
Date: 27 Jan 1994 21:26:18 GMT
Organization: NovAtel Communications Ltd.
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <2i9bhq$jjr@fw.novatel.ca>
References: <ETLDNCN.94Jan21133424@paddington.ericsson.se> <tgmCK1ADu.DC8@netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sidney.novatel.ca
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
Thomas G. McWilliams (tgm@netcom.com) wrote:
: etldncn@paddington.ericsson.se wrote:
: : I ask this because I think many people are confused by the fact the
: : the group is called 386bsd but 386bsd 0.1 is effectively obsolete.
: Perhaps 386bsd is effectively obsolete, but it is not officially
: obsolete is it? Have the Jolitzes officially abandoned release 0.2?
: It was promised for last June. Release dates can slip of course.
: It would be nice if the Jolitzes would provide a progress report
: or at least a report of their intentions. Has anyone heard one way
: or the other about their plans?
The next question being; does anyone *care*???
--
hpeyerl@novatel.ca | NovAtel Commnications Ltd.
hpeyerl@fsa.ca | <nothing I say matters anyway>
<NetBSD: A drinking group with a serious computing problem!>