Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!olivea!uunet!uunet.ca!cognos!dealwisb
From: dealwisb@cognos.com (Brian de Alwis)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: I wonder, did AT&T backstab BSDI?
Summary: Mach & BSD & NextStep
Keywords: AT&T speculation lawsuit BSDI
Message-ID: <1992Jul28.220927.2278@cognos.com>
Date: 28 Jul 92 22:09:27 GMT
References: <1992Jul28.153750.8395@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>
Organization: Cognos Incorporated, Ottawa CANADA
Lines: 12
In article <1992Jul28.153750.8395@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> knight@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Knight of the Living Dead) writes:
>If so, Steve Jobs at NeXT may find MACH being charged with having
>unlicenced BSD-like code that is property of AT&T.
If memory serves me correctly, NeXTStep is based on Mach 2.5 (or
2.3?), which requires an AT&T license. So NeXT should be safe.
+++BdA
--
+++BdA Brian de Alwis. Brain on loan to Cognos Inc, Ottawa, Ontario.
dealwisb@cognos.com, or bsdealwi@napier.{waterloo.edu,uwaterloo.ca}
"Nine out of ten men who tried camels said they preferred women"