*BSD News Article 26986


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!tgm
From: tgm@netcom.com (Thomas G. McWilliams)
Subject: Re: USL vs. BSDI Lawsuit Settled
Message-ID: <tgmCKv40r.Iz5@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <2j45sm$39l@BSDI.COM> <WAYNE.94Feb7070413@backbone.uucp>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 1994 16:19:39 GMT
Lines: 16

Wayne Schlitt (wayne@backbone.uucp) wrote:
: :     For a limited period of time, BSDI may continue to
: :     distribute its BSD/386 product, although certain portions of the
: :     code may be distributed in binary form.

: which portions are these, and how does this effect {386,Free,Net}BSD?

It seems that any NET/2 derived work is affected. From the above
quote it appears that continued distribution of full NET/2 source
is not allowed, and that BSDI will have to distribute portions in
binary form until it can substitute the agreed upon portions of
4.4(Lite). I guess that the big question of interest is exactly
what portions of NET/2 are not freely distributable.

Thomas
tgm@netcom.com