*BSD News Article 27001


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!news.adelaide.edu.au!basser.cs.su.oz.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!seagoon.newcastle.edu.au!wabbit.cc.uow.edu.au!dmssyd.syd.dms.CSIRO.AU!dmsperth.per.dms.CSIRO.AU!uniwa!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!festival!edcogsci!richard
From: richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin)
Subject: Re: USL vs. BSDI Lawsuit Settled
Message-ID: <CKvC57.MHy@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh
References: <2j45sm$39l@BSDI.COM> <WAYNE.94Feb7070413@backbone.uucp> <tgmCKv40r.Iz5@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 1994 19:15:06 GMT
Lines: 33

In article <tgmCKv40r.Iz5@netcom.com> tgm@netcom.com (Thomas G. McWilliams) writes:
>It seems that any NET/2 derived work is affected. From the above
>quote it appears that continued distribution of full NET/2 source
>is not allowed, and that BSDI will have to distribute portions in
>binary form until it can substitute the agreed upon portions of
>4.4(Lite). I guess that the big question of interest is exactly
>what portions of NET/2 are not freely distributable.

[Note - I'm not a lawyer.]

The fact that BSDI and UCB agreed not to continue distributing
portions of Net/2 does not mean that they aren't legally freely
distributable.  It just meant that BSDI and UCB decided it was in
their interests to agree to cease distributing them (presumably in
return for USL dropping the suit).  As far as I know, USL has not
threatened any 386BSD (etc) users with lawsuits, and I see no reason
for any of us to worry about it.

Of course, it will make sense for NetBSD and FreeBSD to pick up
replacements from 4.4-lite.

Just to re-iterate: there was no legal decision in the case; it was
settled by agreement and therefore has no implication for what those
of us who weren't parties to the agreement are allowed to do.

-- Richard

PS Can the NetBSD / FreeBSD people confirm that USL haven't tried
   to stop them distributing anything?
-- 
Richard Tobin, HCRC, Edinburgh University                 R.Tobin@ed.ac.uk

"We demand guaranteed rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty" - HHGTTG