*BSD News Article 27206


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!paladin.american.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.msfc.nasa.gov!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!ai-lab!life.ai.mit.edu!mycroft
From: mycroft@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.apps
Subject: Re: Anyone ported scheme?
Date: 11 Feb 1994 14:25:15 GMT
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <MYCROFT.94Feb11092515@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
References: <2ip2gh$3q1@news.csus.edu> <MYCROFT.94Feb7200148@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
	<2ja31b$4af@u.cc.utah.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu
In-reply-to: terry@cs.weber.edu's message of 9 Feb 1994 07:23:23 GMT


In article <2ja31b$4af@u.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry
Lambert) writes:

   Is there a particular reason for the binary-only packaging?

Um, do you know *anything* about how MIT Scheme is packaged?  There is
one source distribution for N machines/OSes, and one binary
distribution for each machine/OS.

People can already get the source, but they will find it very
difficult to bootstrap without binaries.