*BSD News Article 27221


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!CERN.ch!tifrvax.tifr.res.in!bhiksha
From: bhiksha@tifrvax.tifr.res.in
Subject: RE: The Linux/*BSD question
Message-ID: <9FEB94.09433675@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>
Sender: news@news.cern.ch (USENET News System)
Organization: Tata Institute of Fundamental Research
References: <7FEB94.15123829@tifrvax.tifr.res.in> <JKH.94Feb8022109@whisker.hubbard.ie> <JKH.94Feb8230127@whisker.hubbard.ie>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 1994 09:43:36 GMT
Lines: 20

In a previous article, jkh@whisker.hubbard.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard) wrote:
> 
>It was better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick, too, but that
>doesn't make it GOOD! :-)
> 
>1 bad linux/bsd comparison + 1 bad linux/bsd comparison = 2 bad
>linux/bsd comparisons!  If someone wants to put a GOOD Linux/BSD
>comparison together, I'll applaud with all movable appendages.

Youre right :-).
Just for the record: what changes has the 1.0 incarnation of FreeBSD 
undergone since, say, Dec-1 1993? (im not asking about -current/1.1)
I know about netbsd, havent kept track of freebsd..
(and i wouldnt even ask about linux :-)

_______________________________________________________________________________
bhiksha                           |Pres. Kennedy isn't dead.
bhiksha@arjun.csc.tifr.res.in     |He's hiding from the press in Tahiti..
bhiksha@tifrvax.bitnet            |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------