Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!CERN.ch!tifrvax.tifr.res.in!bhiksha From: bhiksha@tifrvax.tifr.res.in Subject: RE: The Linux/*BSD question Message-ID: <9FEB94.09433675@tifrvax.tifr.res.in> Sender: news@news.cern.ch (USENET News System) Organization: Tata Institute of Fundamental Research References: <7FEB94.15123829@tifrvax.tifr.res.in> <JKH.94Feb8022109@whisker.hubbard.ie> <JKH.94Feb8230127@whisker.hubbard.ie> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 1994 09:43:36 GMT Lines: 20 In a previous article, jkh@whisker.hubbard.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard) wrote: > >It was better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick, too, but that >doesn't make it GOOD! :-) > >1 bad linux/bsd comparison + 1 bad linux/bsd comparison = 2 bad >linux/bsd comparisons! If someone wants to put a GOOD Linux/BSD >comparison together, I'll applaud with all movable appendages. Youre right :-). Just for the record: what changes has the 1.0 incarnation of FreeBSD undergone since, say, Dec-1 1993? (im not asking about -current/1.1) I know about netbsd, havent kept track of freebsd.. (and i wouldnt even ask about linux :-) _______________________________________________________________________________ bhiksha |Pres. Kennedy isn't dead. bhiksha@arjun.csc.tifr.res.in |He's hiding from the press in Tahiti.. bhiksha@tifrvax.bitnet | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------