*BSD News Article 27305


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!ames!cronkite.cisco.com!cisco.com!vandys
From: vandys@cisco.com (Andrew Valencia)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: FreeBSD on a '286?
Followup-To: alt.folklore.computers
Date: 13 Feb 94 15:56:05 GMT
Organization: cisco Systems
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <vandys.761154965@cisco.com>
References: <bdm3.761099508@isis.msstate.edu> <1994Feb13.070255.1474@emba.uvm.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: glare.cisco.com

In <1994Feb13.070255.1474@emba.uvm.edu> wollman@bajoran.emba.uvm.edu (Garrett Wollman) writes:
>In article <bdm3.761099508@isis.msstate.edu>,
>Dewayne McNair <bdm3@Ra.MsState.Edu> wrote:
>>Hi.  Just wondering if FreeBSD would work on a '286?  I know, 
>>I know :)  Don't laugh......
>Not a chance.
>Only 32-bit CPUs with working memory management need apply.

Well, true enough for FreeBSD.  But there *was* a port of 4.3-tahoe to
the 286--it was called BSD/AT.  It had the filesystem, scheduling, job
control, etc.  I think I was the last person hacking on it; when I turned
off the lights I had just allowed it to use more than 64K of RAM for the
buffer cache.

Because it was based on encumbered source, I (1) can't give you a copy, and
(2) don't work at a source licensed shop any more, so don't have a copy
myself.  Oh, and (3) it was pretty ugly anyway. :-)

Follow ups to alt.folklore.computers.

						Andy Valencia