Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:8729 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1937 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU!werple.apana.org.au!zikzak.apana.org.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!umn.edu!eel!cheangk From: cheangk@eel.micro.umn.edu (Pitt Cheang) Subject: [A] Why (Free & Net)BSD use different binaries? Message-ID: <CL97Fu.8rC@news.cis.umn.edu> Sender: news@news.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration) Nntp-Posting-Host: eel.micro.umn.edu Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis: Under Grad Workstation Lab. References: <CL7tvx.A74@news.cis.umn.edu> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 1994 06:50:23 GMT Lines: 17 I really have to thank all who had pointed me the path to go and told me such a wonderful (touching) history about *BSD for personal computer. However, due to the contradition in the opinions that I had received, it would be wise for me to keep them for my own judgement, publiclize them would only cause spark (if not flame), too dangerours. My final decision is to go for all free OS I could get, meanwhile, wait for the soon to be release newer FreeBSD and NetBSD, don forget the soon to be release Linux 1.0. I am planning to get all the best and worse, since they are all designed to address different needs. Too bad I only have two hard drivers, DOS was accidently erased last week (could be intentionly, must be my daemon inside). How would people here suggest putting 3 OS on two 200M HD ?? Thanks again for you time.