*BSD News Article 27387


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!convex!convex!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!Germany.EU.net!arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de!arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de!not-for-mail
From: wb@arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de (Wilhelm B. Kloke)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: NIS (yp client) support in *BSD
Date: 15 Feb 1994 09:12:37 +0100
Organization: Inst f Arbeitsphysiologie Dortmund
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <2jq05l$bo6@mips.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de>
References: <2jd12b$avc@ifado.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de> <MYCROFT.94Feb11095728@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mips.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de

In article <MYCROFT.94Feb11095728@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu>,
Charles Hannum <mycroft@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>   [...] NetBSD-current does not support SCSI devices which are
>   offline at boot time, [...]
>
>   and no codrv.
>
>   And I am not happy with the reordering done to the gnu tree,
>   because it makes it more difficult to be actual in GCC. At least, I
>   to get the stuff twice (from GNU AND NetBSD).
>
>None of the things you've mentioned are different under FreeBSD, so I
>don't see your point.
These were different under 0.1+pk0.2.4, and I hope, in FreeBSD also.
Of course, the method for offline devices was clumsy, but it is missing
in NetBSD at all. Codrv is there.
The bad thing in reordering the GNU tree is that Gnu is adding steadily
new stuff, and I have different systems, e.g. Ultrix. Therefore I have to
update my stuff sometimes from GNU. Having it twice is not a very good
idea. And reordering stuff which is best gotten from some other source
is a bad idea from NetBSD. Iff there are enhancements like shared libs
this stuff should be submitted to the gnu effort.wbk
-- 
Dipl.-Math. Wilhelm Bernhard Kloke
Institut fuer Arbeitsphysiologie an der Universitaet Dortmund
Ardeystrasse 67, D-44139 Dortmund, Tel. 0231-1084-257