Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!foxhound.dsto.gov.au!fang.dsto.gov.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!news.adelaide.edu.au!basser.cs.su.oz.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!ticipa!landru.mtc.ti.com!rmfowler From: rmfowler@landru.mtc.ti.com (Rex Fowler) Subject: high-speed slip/ppp reliability Message-ID: <1994Feb18.172307.17380@ticipa.pac.sc.ti.com> Sender: usenet@ticipa.pac.sc.ti.com (USENET News System) Organization: Manufacturing Technology Center, Texas Instruments, Dallas Date: Fri, 18 Feb 1994 17:23:07 GMT Lines: 13 Most of the documentation and comparisons I've seen between freebsd and netbsd seem to agree that the serial throughput on freebsd is more reliable than netbsd. Is this still true in the *-current trees? I am interested in doing slip/cslip/ppp via modem and I want to choose the OS that is best suited for this. So far, I have used neither of the systems. -- Rex Fowler Inet : <rmfowler@landru.mtc.ti.com> Texas Instruments TI MSG : rfow Dallas Tx Phone : (214)995-4001