Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!hookup!ames!lll-winken.llnl.gov!fastrac.llnl.gov!osi-east2.es.net!pnl-oracle!netnews.nwnet.net!ns1.nodak.edu!plains.NoDak.edu!tinguely From: tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu (Mark Tinguely) Subject: Re: Notes on the *new* FreeBSD V1.1 VM system Sender: usenet@ns1.nodak.edu (Usenet login) Message-ID: <CLqK5I.IzH@ns1.nodak.edu> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 1994 15:53:41 GMT References: <2ke3ss$l0d@u.cc.utah.edu> <Ja4p+zR.dysonj@delphi.com> <2khcvv$han@u.cc.utah.edu> Nntp-Posting-Host: plains.nodak.edu Organization: North Dakota State University Lines: 15 In article <2khcvv$han@u.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) writes: >The main problem I would like to overcome is ETXTBSY; ETXTBSY is simply >broken. [text deleted] >I have been thinking on this a long time, and I get a little religious... >8-) 8-). it took awhile, but I was finally converted to Terry's ETXTBSY religion. But I confess, I like the lazy allocation, and believe that we can avoid depleting the swap. For the last two or so month, I have been too busy do anything about either beliefs. --mark.