Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!olivea!uunet!uunet!not-for-mail From: revell@ghidra.UU.NET (James R Revell Jr) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: 386BSD 0.1 release Message-ID: <157ovgINN2bo@ghidra.UU.NET> Date: 30 Jul 92 03:51:12 GMT References: <1451eoINNcsv@agate.berkeley.edu> <147pi1INNb1g@ghidra.UU.NET> <14c63bINNh22@agate.berkeley.edu> Reply-To: revell@uunet.uu.net (James R Revell Jr) Organization: UUNET Technologies Inc, Falls Church, VA Lines: 18 NNTP-Posting-Host: ghidra.uu.net In article <14c63bINNh22@agate.berkeley.edu> wjolitz@soda.berkeley.edu (William F. Jolitz) writes: } Do *not* obtain 386BSD from uunet! BSDI is funded partially from UUNET } coffers, and those idiots still see 386BSD as a rival to their hopes. } } As with other related situations, they have come up with "plausibly deniable" } reasons to not provide information that they feel affects their competitive } advantages. Well, despite what Bill may say or think, this is not true. I said before that UUNET would drop our no-binaries policy when I got the new disks up on the archive, and since I've just finished moving the archive from uunet.uu.net to the new 9 GB on ftp.uu.net, that policy is now history. I have included the rest of the 386BSD distribution in our mirror -- James Revell Network Services Mgr <revell@uunet.uu.net> /8^{~