Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!boulder!tali.hsc.colorado.edu!buckie.ucha!mvb.saic.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.uoregon.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!bsd.coe.montana.edu!nate Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: Installation Problems Message-ID: <2kvv2d$3jb@pdq.coe.montana.edu> From: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) Date: 1 Mar 1994 17:46:53 GMT References: <762367542tim.news@xplora.toppoint.de> <2kv2cv$po5@news.u.washington.edu> Organization: Montana State University, Bozeman MT NNTP-Posting-Host: bsd.coe.montana.edu Lines: 18 In article <2kv2cv$po5@news.u.washington.edu>, Mark Tamola <mola@u.washington.edu> wrote: >Or, you could just skip NetBSD altogether, and install FreeBSD, which is almost >the same thing, and has a much, much easier installation process (it figures >all the numbers out for ya). I prefer NetBSD, but hey, use whichever works >for you, as NetBSD is a lot more technical. Not! There is no *more* overall technical merit in NetBSD over FreeBSD unless you want to argue which has more technical merit, but that's just flame-bait. Both have technical strengths and weaknesses. Nate -- nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu | FreeBSD core member and all around tech. nate@cs.montana.edu | weenie. work #: (406) 994-4836 | Graduating May '94 with a BS in EE home #: (406) 586-0579 | - looking for work in CS/EE field.