*BSD News Article 27922


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!nigel.msen.com!math.fu-berlin.de!news.th-darmstadt.de!zib-berlin.de!netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!news
From: bs@Germany.EU.net (Bernard Steiner)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development
Subject: Re: Coexisting on the PC
Date: 2 Mar 1994 11:08:12 +0100
Organization: EUnet Deutschland GmbH, Dortmund, Germany
Lines: 17
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <2l1oic$m5d@Germany.EU.net>
References: <CLz6un.A9G@rex.uokhsc.edu> <CLzu0M.J9s@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: qwerty.germany.eu.net


In article <CLzu0M.J9s@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) writes:
|> In article <CLz6un.A9G@rex.uokhsc.edu> benjamin-goldsteen@uokhsc.edu writes:
|> >    I have a proposition: I think the devices for 386BSD should renamed
|> >to better conform to the PC.
|> 
|> I disagree.  To many of us, consistency with MSDOS is worthless.  It's
|> consistency with the rest of BSD that matters.

I second the latter. There's *no* DOS on my machine *at all*.

By the way. If you find that you want your disks be called something else,
why don't you simply rename the appropriate device, or link it to another
name. I'm pretty sure the system wouldn't mind you mounting /bin/sync if it's
a block special... :)

Bernard