Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!Germany.EU.net!news From: bs@Germany.EU.net (Bernard Steiner) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Subject: Re: Notes on the *new* FreeBSD V1.1 VM system Date: 2 Mar 1994 11:15:00 +0100 Organization: EUnet Deutschland GmbH, Dortmund, Germany Lines: 10 Distribution: world Message-ID: <2l1ov4$m7o@Germany.EU.net> References: <CLutBp.4K9@flatlin.ka.sub.org> <2kudpoINNbhd@CS.UTK.EDU> <1994Mar1.132637.58107@ans.net> <a09878.762550221@giant> <2l0b06$2qi@GRAPEVINE.LCS.MIT.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: qwerty.germany.eu.net In article <2l0b06$2qi@GRAPEVINE.LCS.MIT.EDU>, wollman@ginger.lcs.mit.edu (Garrett Wollman) writes: |> In article <a09878.762550221@giant>, |> Curt Sampson <a09878@giant.rsoft.bc.ca> wrote: |> >But isn't this what the vfork() system call is for? |> vfork() isn't POSIX. But then, neither is memory overcommit. Hmm. Is that socket() stuff POSIX ? -Bernard