Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:10440 comp.unix.bsd:13522 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!foxhound.dsto.gov.au!fang.dsto.gov.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!news.adelaide.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!news.cic.net!locust.cic.net!pauls From: pauls@locust.cic.net (Paul Southworth) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: BSD vs. Linux Date: 8 Mar 1994 16:24:55 GMT Organization: ETEXT Lines: 19 Message-ID: <2li8sn$6m8@spruce.cic.net> References: <1994Mar8.141900.2906@wubios.wustl.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: locust.cic.net In article <1994Mar8.141900.2906@wubios.wustl.edu>, David J Camp <david@wubios.wustl.edu> wrote: >What are the relative merits of NetBSD vs. Linux? Is either >technically superior? I suppose BSD is more portable. How difficult >is would it be to port the Linux utilities to BSD? -David- :%s;BSD;Coke Classic; :%s;Linux;Pepsi; They're free. Try them both. If people could actually agree that one is better, it would be impossible to explain why both have such large and devoted followings. -- Paul Southworth CICNet Systems Support pauls@cic.net